Revised Income Trust Income Portfolio

This revised retirement income portfolio has a starting yield of 4.4% is internationally diversified and backtesting proved that its income payouts would have weathered the post 2008 period when dividends were often cut.

I´ve learnt many lessons for the 2008 market crash and the Brexit ups and downs and whilst my investment trust income portfolio performed well (12 year review)it could have done a lot better.  So I´ve chopped and changed to optimise my retirement income portfolio but my preference for Investment Trusts remains firm. (see post).

Out go REITS and trusts that pay dividends from capital and in remain or join  trusts that maintained or grew dividends post 2008 crash and have good dividend cover.



2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
CITY OF LONDON £57 £64 £68 £70 £73 £76 £79 £82 £85 £88 £92 £98
EDINBURGH IT £71 £73 £74 £75 £79 £82 £84 £85 £87 £91 £95 £95
HENDERSON FAR EAST £51 £74 £76 £84 £92 £98 £105 £112 £118 £123 £128 £133
EUROPEAN ASSETS £123 £135 £63 £79 £92 £75 £97 £116 £112 £153 £143 £119
MURRAY INT £53 £62 £73 £96 £110 £100 £110 £103 £115 £129 £130 £125
PERPETUAL INCOME AND GROWTH £49 £53 £55 £58 £65 £70 £74 £77 £80 £83 £130 £135
F and C UK PROPERTY £72 £73 £77 £77 £77 £77 £77 £53 £53 £53 £53 £53
ANNUAL DIVIDENDS £475 £535 £486 £538 £587 £578 £625 £627 £650 £720 £772 £758
DIVIDEND YIELD 4.2% 5.0% 6.2% 5.5% 5.2% 5.3% 5.1% 4.6% 4.5% 5.2% 5.1% 4.6%


My original portfolio fared well in the decade following the 2008 crash. Dividends increased 60% over the 10 years which is an annualised rate of 4.8% around inflation +2%.  The disappointments were the European Assets Trust and ´F&C´ UK Property.  European Assets pay dividends from capital and have a target of 6% of NAV.  When the market crashed in 2008 by nearly 50% so did the dividend payout.  There are various “income” trusts whose dividends are partly funded from capital rather than from their dividend revenue.  These trusts will always have payouts vulnerable to market performance – a lesson learnt and to be avoided in the future.  Low dividend coverage is a warning sign and it is always useful to check the annual reports to compare revenue receipts with total dividend payout.  If payouts exceed revenue then the trust is either paying from capital receipts or dipping into revenue reserves.

´F&C´ wasn´t the only property trust to suffer post 2008.  Property is incorrectly thought of as being uncorrelated with the  equity market but history shows they usually crash in tandem and in 2008 all property trusts suffered severely and most cut dividends and few have been able to restore them to their pre-2008 levels.  So whilst some have attractive yields of 5% and above their payouts are too vulnerable to market downturns to be part of my retirement portfolio.

I am always very reluctant to sell any investment.  Buying is always much easier as one can make a rational comparison of potential investments and choose the best prospects.  The impulse to sell is often provoked by a period of poor performance and as markets tend to overreact the share price is likely to under-value the company – so selling is often accompanied by regret when either the share price recovers or a predator recognises the under-valuation and makes a bid.  In some cases I have actually got the selling right – I sold Carillion a year or so before its demise and Woodford Income quite a while back.  But I´ve probably made more selling mistakes than good judgements.   In the case of the Income Portfolio I´m only selling European Assets and will build a new portfolio in place of the individual shares I hold in my SIPP.  Whilst there is some over lap in portfolios I have tried to have some newcomers to add diversification in the holdings.

With my new portfolio I´ve analysed performance back to pre-crash 2007 looking primarily for trusts that have had been able to maintain or increase dividends post-crash and have had total returns at lease equal to the FTSE All share.  Its very easy to get 5 year performance but for me the real test is when the going gets hard which most recently was 2008.  With the Brexit currency ups and downs in mind and the under performance of the UK market I´ve also aimed to have greater geographical diversification.

I´ve analysed performance assuming purchases in January 2007.  Markets peaked around July 2007 at around 7% higher than January levels and thereafter declined bottoming out around March 2009 some 40% below its highs.

The average yield of the portfolio in January 2007 was 4.3% and had the portfolio been purchased in March 2020  the yield would have been 4.4%.



North American Income 13.2% 3.2% 9.5% 1.33
Schroder Oriental Income 9.6% 4.5% 5.7% 1.15
JPMorgan European Income 6.3% 4.6% 7.1% 1.15
JPMorgan Claverhouse 5.3% 4.1% 7.7% 1.48
City of London 5.7% 4.8% 4.7% 0.76
Schroder Income Growth 5.6% 4.6% 4.4% 1.39
HICL Infrastructure 6.9% 4.7% 2.5% NA
Murray International 8.2% 4.9% 3.7% 1.07
AVERAGE 7.6% 4.4% 5.7%

Dividends grew from 2007 at an annualised rate of rate of 7.35%, from £427/year to £1074.  Total annualised return including capital was 7.6%

An initial investment of £10,000 would have grown to £16,447 by March 2020 plus a total of £9,216 paid in dividends.
The portfolio is nearly 50% invested in the UK and the remainder diversified globally:-

In theory my new income portfolio should provide me with greater diversification and higher dividend growth with less risk of declines in annual payouts.  Over the next 24 months I shall be revamping my SIPP in line with the new portfolio by selling off individual share holdings.  Until the transformation is complete I shall be monitoring performance using a virtual portfolio.


Leave a Reply